Stargate38's Saves (all exponents)

What did you draw?
Post Reply
Stargate38
Posts: 68
Joined: Thu Aug 15, 2013 3:06 pm
Location: Visible Universe
Contact:

Stargate38's Saves (all exponents)

Post by Stargate38 »

My first attempt at an r^0 triple star system. I think it's stable, but I've only run it 5-6 full orbits:

Code: Select all

Gravity Fun at TestTubeGames.com: [ForceG: 0,Qual: 1,Zoom: 0.3,xSet: 0,ySet: 0], [x0: -480,y0: 0,vx: 0,vy: 11.133,t0: 0,who: 2,m: 2000], [x0: 480,y0: 0,vx: 0,vy: -11.133,t0: 0,who: 2,m: 2000], [x0: 720,y0: 0,vx: 0,vy: 0,t0: 0,who: 2,m: 2000]
A stable r^-1 triple system (Tight binary with distant companion):

Code: Select all

Gravity Fun at TestTubeGames.com: [ForceG: -1,Qual: 1,Zoom: 0.3,xSet: 0,ySet: 0], [x0: -0,y0: 0,vx: 0,vy: 0,t0: 0,who: 2,m: 8000], [x0: 40,y0: 0,vx: 0,vy: 8.944,t0: 0,who: 2,m: 4000], [x0: -400,y0: 0,vx: 0,vy: -8.944,t0: 0,who: 2,m: 4000]
All r^1 systems are stable. This one contains 1 negative mass and 2 positive ones:

Code: Select all

Gravity Fun at TestTubeGames.com: [ForceG: 1,Qual: 1,Zoom: 0.3,xSet: 0,ySet: 0], [x0: 10,y0: 0,vx: 0,vy: 1,t0: 0,who: 2,m: 8000], [x0: 168.88,y0: 0,vx: 0,vy: 16.888,t0: 0,who: 2,m: 4000], [x0: -188.88,y0: 0,vx: 0,vy: 18.888,t0: 0,who: 2,m: -4000]
More coming later...
I LOVE your Gravity Simulator! :)
exfret
Posts: 585
Joined: Sun Jul 28, 2013 8:40 pm

Re: Stargate38's Saves (all exponents)

Post by exfret »

Stargate38 wrote:My first attempt at an r^0 triple star system. I think it's stable, but I've only run it 5-6 full orbits:

Code: Select all

Gravity Fun at TestTubeGames.com: [ForceG: 0,Qual: 1,Zoom: 0.3,xSet: 0,ySet: 0], [x0: -480,y0: 0,vx: 0,vy: 11.133,t0: 0,who: 2,m: 2000], [x0: 480,y0: 0,vx: 0,vy: -11.133,t0: 0,who: 2,m: 2000], [x0: 720,y0: 0,vx: 0,vy: 0,t0: 0,who: 2,m: 2000]
It seemed pretty stable. How'd you make it? Did you do any fancy calculations?
Stargate38 wrote:A stable r^-1 triple system (Tight binary with distant companion):

Code: Select all

Gravity Fun at TestTubeGames.com: [ForceG: -1,Qual: 1,Zoom: 0.3,xSet: 0,ySet: 0], [x0: -0,y0: 0,vx: 0,vy: 0,t0: 0,who: 2,m: 8000], [x0: 40,y0: 0,vx: 0,vy: 8.944,t0: 0,who: 2,m: 4000], [x0: -400,y0: 0,vx: 0,vy: -8.944,t0: 0,who: 2,m: 4000]
Now this looks a lot like ARP's fractal Universe. Have you seen it?
Stargate38 wrote:All r^1 systems are stable. This one contains 1 negative mass and 2 positive ones:

Code: Select all

Gravity Fun at TestTubeGames.com: [ForceG: 1,Qual: 1,Zoom: 0.3,xSet: 0,ySet: 0], [x0: 10,y0: 0,vx: 0,vy: 1,t0: 0,who: 2,m: 8000], [x0: 168.88,y0: 0,vx: 0,vy: 16.888,t0: 0,who: 2,m: 4000], [x0: -188.88,y0: 0,vx: 0,vy: 18.888,t0: 0,who: 2,m: -4000]
Awesome! It inspired me to make this:

Code: Select all

Gravity Fun at TestTubeGames.com: [ForceG: 1,Qual: 1,Zoom: 0.3,xSet: 6.65,ySet: 0], [x0: 10,y0: 0,vx: 0,vy: 1,t0: 0,who: 2,m: 8000], [x0: 168.88,y0: 0,vx: 0,vy: 16.888,t0: 0,who: 2,m: 4000], [x0: -188.88,y0: 0,vx: 0,vy: 18.888,t0: 0,who: 2,m: -4000], [x0: -146.65,y0: -93.33,vx: 16,vy: -21.83,t0: 120,who: 3,m: 0], [x0: -159.98,y0: 136.67,vx: -20.67,vy: -23.5,t0: 200,who: 3,m: 0], [x0: 570.02,y0: 153.33,vx: 22.17,vy: -25.67,t0: 270,who: 3,m: 0], [x0: -183.32,y0: 206.67,vx: -30.83,vy: -24.5,t0: 330,who: 3,m: 0], [x0: -266.65,y0: -183.33,vx: 21.33,vy: -30,t0: 380,who: 3,m: 0], [x0: -73.32,y0: 323.33,vx: -48,vy: -21.17,t0: 420,who: 3,m: 0], [x0: -359.98,y0: -226.67,vx: 29.33,vy: -35.5,t0: 450,who: 3,m: 0], [x0: -233.32,y0: 353.33,vx: -48.17,vy: -26.67,t0: 470,who: 3,m: 0]
Stargate38 wrote:More coming later...
Do more negative mass things. Those are always interesting!
Nobody ever notices my signature. ):
Post Reply